Minnesota has experienced a disturbing rise in hate crimes over the past three years, with annual reports ranging from 185 to 274 incidents. Following reporting disruptions tied to the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), 2022 saw a sharp 32% drop in documented incidents, followed by a 13% increase in 2023, totaling 209 cases. Nearly half of these incidents were based on race or ethnicity, while over 21% were driven by religious bias. More than 60% involved direct crimes against people, assault, threats, or harassment, while 37% were property-based. These numbers likely underrepresent the full extent of hate, given widespread underreporting.
For Minnesota’s Muslim communities, the threat has become especially acute. Between 2022 and 2024, the state led the nation in attacks on mosques and Islamic centers, with over 40 incidents—including vandalism, arson, and intimidation—causing more than $3 million in damages. Concentrated in the Twin Cities, these crimes reflect an alarming surge in Islamophobia and have left many Muslim residents feeling targeted, unsafe, and unheard. This toolkit exists to confront that reality, with data, reporting tools, and critical resources for response and protection.
1. Understanding Hate Crimes in Our State
Definition under state and federal law:
Minnesota State Law: A hate crime is a criminal offense motivated by bias against a victim’s actual or perceived race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, national origin, or disability. These crimes carry enhanced penalties under state law.
Federal Law (U.S. DOJ): A hate crime is a criminal act motivated by bias against a person’s race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity. The DOJ distinguishes between hate crimes and hate incidents—the latter being acts of prejudice that do not involve a crime, violence, threat, or property damage.
Difference between hate crime and hate incident:
Gaps in hate crime data collection:
Hate crime data reporting is incomplete for many reasons. Only a fraction of the more than 18,000 federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies reported even a single hate crime to the FBI in 2023. Many agencies lack the training to identify, report, and respond to hate crimes. Only 19 states have laws requiring that officers be trained to identify and investigate hate crimes. Numerous police departments also have misconceptions about handling hate crimes. According to a national survey by ProPublica, many agencies wrongly believe it is up to prosecutors to deem an incident a hate crime. In fact, state law definitions of what constitutes a hate crime are irrelevant for FBI data collection purposes, as outlined in their comprehensive Hate Crime Data Collection Guidelines and Training Manual. And, though the FBI itself has begun reporting hate crimes, many federal law enforcement agencies—and the military service branches—do not. It is estimated that two-thirds of hate crimes are unreported, and nearly 80% of jurisdictions claim there were no hate crimes.